There’s All Kinds Out There.

Thanks. Let's see responses.

IT’S “THE PEOPLE” VERSUS THE GOVERNMENT … Wait A Minute,

                             THE PEOPLE ARE THE GOVERNMENT!

This National Security Agency has people working inside it - they are working for US. The problem lies in privacy versus information; The NSA (not NRA) wants to know what ‘we’ are doing, ‘we’ want to be left alone.

Any national security problem concerns itself with ”what is it”? That would be the NSA, the CIA, the FBI, the DIA or whatever 3 or more alphabet letters you choose to print. They want to know, “are they secure”, “is there any leak”, “does anyone know”, “are the bad guys planning something big”, or the Big Guys planning something bad? Those are far-reaching, world-wide, and permanent arguments in question, Mr.Internet, and soon, very soon it will reach Mars. Those are very definite concerns for each and every American, and not something to be complained over and look away. Let’s get it right the first time.

Any private citizen wants to put his ‘life story’ on the ‘net,  and/or be assured that only friends; or ‘gfs’ they are looking for, get that; or business associates get what data they enter and only them - no one else. “I’m a private citizen, and my Right’s are in question here, Mr.!”

Nobody, nobody, nobody cares if you listen to itunes while you work. Nobody cares if you watch humorous, or raunchy YouTube videos. No one cares if you email your significant other about groceries to bring home (Okay, some, but not all). And nobody (else) cares about your social website ‘data’.

Only when illegal are you breaking the law. The same-sex marraige and  proposed marijuana laws are an example of how to change a law that some think is worthwhile, demonstrating about something that they ‘feel’ is right. That may be upsetting to others, but it’s the ”right way” to get such things done, peacefully. Let’s air out our differences.

The NSA vs “the people” is truly Worldwide, in as diverse places as Germany, England, Brazil and Venezuela. With those being the most vociferous, it’s certain this ‘trouble’ is elsewhere, hidden behind cultural differences or need for power. And, due to the necessating - secrecy - involved, seems one-sided, America - the NSA  vs ”US” - with US on the always right’ side. In any case, a ‘business’ will not want scrutiny - someone will always find something wrong. Standing back, one can see that it’s also everyone using an internet, infranet or ‘some such similar software sequence’. Only two days ago - I heard that was 85% of the United States.

Someone (hint: person in Russia) is in the middle, joined by news readers daily. He may be offered and accept amnesty, and promised ”Due Process”. That would be only expected.

It requires noted knowledge in The Constitution about our rights, which is how and why this has gotten so much publicity, somewhat like President Roosevelt warned us about, ”the Military-Industrial Complex”. Once started, it’s a ‘steamroller’.

There has to be a middle ground. No one person is going to get away with any criminal activity of any type, not at this point. No business of any size or type is going to gather up everyone’s private contact data and sell or ‘pass it along’ - legally, including Target stores, who recently had private credit data hacked.

The current situation is this; a national government agency of no previous national ill repute has - without direct, obvious choice, one way or the other within that agency, chosen to protect the nation in the best, and with the most significant means possible without causing obvious upset, until now.

The problem is that many folks with responsibility over large number of more or less randomly insignificant ‘security keys’ have been publicly been ”scooped”, to use a news term, by a former ”insider”. Supposedly, “insiders know it all”, and have evidentally touched a nerve from the distance of a former “Cold” opponent. For the uniformed, that means that anything from that side is suspect and immediately deemed wrong. It’s like the ‘60’s song title, “That Was Then, This Is Now”.

Just today, the president is meeting with fifteen heads of companies in Silicon Valley to talk over ‘surveillance reform’ in an open letter. According to this source, they also want to talk of ”sharing more information”. Hmm. And, on December nineteenth, all 193 member states of the UN voted ”to respect and protect rights to privacy, and that includes digital communication”, according to RT.

So remember, it’s ubiquitous - has to do with our connections - on the internet.

It’s a ‘high-profile’ subject, including heads of state and very large, worldwide industry.

It’s from ‘the Cold side’, touchy.

It has to do with ”our Rights”, never an uninteresting discussion.

It should be questioned to get it right the first time, being ubiquitous, high profile, touchy -and- has to do, very much, with our future.

So, why not, when we are filling that yes/no form on our ‘profile’ or entering into that ‘social website’ or signing up on the latest news site, have two sides, one with public, one with private information that ‘We’ and the NSA require for internet use? That would make it obvious as to what ‘they’ get, and what what ‘we’ keep’, possibly in ‘non internet connected memory’. What we should do is, 1) require new inputs for new ‘net input, public and private, and 2) decide what to do with Mr. Amnesty.

Any comments on this Blog are welcomed.

December 22, 2013

Sources: NPRadio, author’s background, RT news

(Did someone say this is “a Never Ending Story”?)

DS

How Americans Think About Climate Change, in Six Maps - The New York Times

How Americans Think About Climate Change, in Six Maps – The New York Times

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/03/21/climate/how-americans-think-about-climate-change-in-six-maps.html?rref=collection/sectioncollection/climate&action=click&contentCollection=climate®ion=rank&module=package&version=highlights&contentPlacement=8&pgtype=sectionfront&_r=0

Most Americans believe Climate Change will not affect them.

David Schaedler 5/26/17

View On WordPress

YOUR SISTER

    I have a sister, but we don’t talk. We should, I have that feeling. We grew up together, I left when a teen to go to school and I had seen her some. We still haven’t talked at all. I talk to my brothers just fine. I’m old now and want to make amends, however, I can’t think of how to break the barrier between us. I get the impression it’s just like another person, being so close. Ideas? Comments?

DS :-)

10172015

https://plus.google.com/100212344229354267307/posts/b8ULRoULuXX?_utm_source=1-2-2

All the 16 things that occurred on 1/15/History.

California State Assembly Meeting

Update on the Oroville Dam.

The Assembly Meeting is occurring now, on the California channel. Known history and problems involved were discussed. Repair efforts for the dam by DWR will cost $274 million. “How can we make sure this doesn’t happen again?”

David Schaedler 5/11/17 1:15 pm PST.

Photograph from google images for my blog, “dmschaedlersblog”, titled “Use and abuse of immediate food”, dated May 13, 2013. I’m late.

David Schaedler

10/13/15

Oroville Spillway Update August 8, 2017

Oroville Dam Spillway Reconstruction latest shown. Watch this very interesting YouTube video.

Sent from ABC10 ) Oroville Spillway to receive after use inspection, and, possible repair.

Women’s intuition is such a blessing; Knowing when someone’s lying is incredible. Men think women don’t know when they’re full of shit and they think we believe them. Just keep giving us more reasons to laugh at your foolish asses. Idiots -____-

(via curlstrosity)

There’s all kinds out there.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/politics/ct-acting-attorney-general-justice-department-trump-refugee-order-20170130-story.html

Acting Attorney General Sally Yates defys the Trump Administration and blocks the Refugee Ban. She was let go. 10/30/17 4:30 pm PST ABC10 News.

DS 1/31/17