Hating Jews Will Always Be The Popular Opinion, Save For The Few Years It Is Taboo To Hate Us Bc There

ADHD people and their commas and parentheses :)

If you don’t know how to spell nurodivergent, then I’m assuming you’re nuerodivergent (neurodivergent?)

https://x.com/i/grok/share/5jm2f29zfBdohGHdrEXwR1CwK

Question: What is the definition of "genocide"? Concise answer.

Answer: Genocide is the deliberate killing of a large number of people from a particular nation or ethnic group with the aim of destroying that group.

-

Question: In the Israel-Palestine conflict that started after Oct 7, 2023, does the evidence support the claim that Israel has perpetrated "genocide"? Give a yes/no answer. Then give your top three concise reasons for your answer.

Answer: No.

Intent and Scale: Genocide requires an intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group. While there have been significant civilian casualties, the primary stated goal of Israel's military actions has been to dismantle Hamas's military capabilities rather than to destroy the Palestinian population as a group.

Legal and International Response: The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has not concluded Israel is committing genocide. Although South Africa brought a case alleging genocide, the ICJ's provisional measures do not confirm genocide but call for actions to prevent such acts, indicating the situation is under legal scrutiny rather than a confirmation of genocide.

Accusations vs. Evidence: Numerous accusations of genocide have been made by various groups and officials, but these are often based on interpretations of statements and actions rather than definitive legal evidence. Scholarly and international legal definitions of genocide require clear evidence of intent, which has been debated extensively without a consensus on its presence in this conflict.

-

Question: In the same conflict, does the evidence support the claim that Palestine and/or Hamas has the intent to perpetrate "genocide"? Give a yes/no answer. Then give your top three concise reasons for your answer.

Answer: Yes.

Hamas Covenant: Hamas's 1988 covenant explicitly calls for the destruction of Israel and contains antisemitic rhetoric, including references to a religious obligation to fight Jews until Judgment Day, which can be interpreted as genocidal intent.

Statements and Actions: Post-October 7, 2023, actions and statements by Hamas leaders have been cited as evidence of intent to commit genocide. For instance, the attack on October 7 was described by some analysts and scholars as having genocidal characteristics due to the indiscriminate targeting of civilians and the scale of violence.

Legal and Scholarly Interpretations: Several legal experts and genocide scholars have argued that Hamas's actions, particularly the October 7 attack, meet criteria for genocidal intent under international law. This includes analyses that cite the deliberate targeting of civilians with the intent to instill fear and cause destruction, which aligns with elements of genocide as per the Genocide Convention.

-

Question: Provide two more concise reasons each for your last two answers.

Answer:

For Israel:

Population Growth: Despite the conflict, the Palestinian population in Gaza has continued to grow, which contradicts the notion of a genocidal campaign aimed at the physical destruction of a group.

Humanitarian Aid: Israel has allowed humanitarian aid into Gaza, despite the blockade, which would not typically align with a genocidal strategy that aims for the destruction of a group's living conditions.

For Palestine/Hamas:

Post-Attack Celebrations: Celebrations in parts of Gaza and the West Bank following the October 7 attacks, coupled with rhetoric that praised the killing of civilians, suggest an intent to terrorize and potentially eradicate the Israeli population.

Education and Media: Hamas's control over education and media in Gaza has been used to propagate anti-Israeli and antisemitic narratives, promoting a culture of martyrdom and resistance that could be seen as fostering genocidal intent against Jews or Israelis.

--

--

This date will repeat itself. Our children will do everything to ensure that every year has an October 7th. History will repeat itself. I won't update you on the exact date.

But as a mother whose heart is torn, I promise you. Promise. Every year, Netanyaho, will be October 7th, God willing, is our promise with God and Mansour, and God willing Mansour.

==

The ceasefire has barely even taken effect and the "civilians" are already looking forward to their next opportunity to destroy Israel. They've learned nothing. There has been absolutely no impact on them in the 469 days after the Hamas terror attack. Their losses mean nothing to them.

When it starts again, and they will inevitably start it up again, I absolutely will not be able to bring myself to give a single shit what happens to these people. Why am I obligated to care more about their lives than they do? If they don't care about their lives or even the lives of their children - and they don't - why does it become my responsiblity to do so? I unequivocally reject being handed that burden.

They want war. They want to die. Their only objection is that they were losing the war they started.

Wanted to start learning cursive because it’s never made sense to me

The Chanukah prayers always stay stuck in my head for weeks after

Henry Scott Tuke

I don’t understand how someone can watch a season where one character’s main storyline (of that season) is accepting his homosexuality and love for his best friend, and in that same fucking season another character, the best friend he’s in love with too, has a main storyline of not being able to say he loves his girlfriend, and say that there will be nothing going on there. That is so suspicious, even if you don’t consider Mike’s queer coding, and even if you consider the monologue his genuine thoughts and “love redemption” of the season, the fact that that’s his storyline in the same season where we really see Will’s love for him is INSANE. Something is going on next season, that’s for sure.

As a transsexual male, I don’t consider myself biologically female. For one, biology is the study of life, not the study of birth. Also, many things are biological. I’d say biological sex is a combination of body parts, hormones, chromosomes, and your brain. I’d say my body is mostly male. I have a (micro)penis, but no testicles, which not all cisgender men definitely have (whether from birth or from an accident). I have facial hair, a male facial structure, and muscle growth lining up with that of a male’s. At some point my body will be completely male too, as in I will have a penis and testicles. I have normal hormone levels for a male. I’m taking testosterone as a shot, but tons of cisgender males need to as well. I have no clue what my chromosomes are and barely anyone else knows theirs as well. However, I remember finding that a lottt of people with Klinefelter Syndrome ended up being trans women, and seeing some trans women with XX chromosomes, so I wonder if the chromosomes of transsexual people are more likely to match the gender they identify as. Onto brain, at last. Well, that’s the whole point of being transsexual. My brain is male. So to me, I am more biologically male than female.

Okay so when people say "don't radicalize children to hate Israel" and the response you give is "how can they not be radicalized when Israel is killing their parents?" you are actually contributing worse than nothing, you are contributing the very thing that perpetuates the cyclical nature of the conflict. If you don't radicalize children, then they will be open to education and perspective and see Israelis as people—and yes maybe they will still hate Israel, but they will also hate Hamas, who pushed the war as well. You thinking it is okay to be radicalized under specific circumstances is how suicide bombings and child soldiers and hostages happen: I say this to Israelis who were radicalized as well by the war, and I have criticized Israelis (including those close to me) for also thinking indiscriminate violence is okay.

I say, "Ableism is bad." You say, "Ableists all live in their mom's basements and don't contribute anything to society!"

I say, "Misogyny is bad." You say, "Fuck all men."

I say, "Homophobia is bad." You say, "All religious people should be shot in the streets."

I say, "Racism is bad." You say, "White people are the devil."

I say, "Murder is bad." You say, "I hate any idiotic bitch who disagrees with this."

I say, "Body shaming is bad." You say, "Everyone who disagrees is ugly and has small dick energy."

I say, "Fascism is bad." You say, "Yeah, kill all nazis!"

To which I say: you do not know why ableism, misogyny, homophobia, racism, murder, and body shaming, and fascism are wrong.

Go, go and meditate on why these things are wrong and don't come back until you arrive at the answer.