Are You Familiar With The Term “amipotence?” I Was Reminded Of It When You Answered Anon About Omnipotence.

Are you familiar with the term “amipotence?” I was reminded of it when you answered anon about omnipotence. Curious of your thoughts on it

I have never heard of it but I looked it up AND IT LOOKS FREAKING AWESOME!!!!!

I found an article written by the guy who coined it and uhhh I’ll just post like the whole thing lollll

Amipotence combines two Latin words ami and potens. The first means “love,” and we find it in words like “amicable,” “amity,” and “amigo.” The second is the Latin word for power or influence, and we find it in “potential” and “potency.” Amipotence is pronounced, “am” (as in “Amsterdam”), with a short “i” (as in “it”), and “po-tence” (similar to “moments”).

I coined this word to stress the priority of love over power in God. Divine love (ami) comes logically and conceptually prior to divine power (potens). We best understand God in general and divine power in particular if we give love pride of place. Love comes first.

Amipotence interprets the Johannine phrase “God is love” (1 Jn. 4:8,16) to mean love comes first in God. God is necessarily loving, because it’s God’s eternal and unchanging nature to love. God could no more stop loving than stop existing; but both are metaphysical impossibilities. Amipotence agrees with John Wesley when he says, “God is often styled holy, righteous, wise… [but] he is said to be love: intimating that this is . . . his reigning attribute, the attribute that sheds an amiable glory on all his other perfections.”

Crucial to making sense of amipotence is making sense of love. Most theologians say God loves, and some say divine love is powerful. But few define love carefully or allow love to characterize divine power in a satisfactory way. As a result, the majority portray God’s love in ways that differ radically from what we consider love.

[…]

We best define the love in amipotence as acting intentionally, in relational response to God and others, to promote overall well-being. This definition applies to both divine and creaturely love. The love God and creatures express, in other words, involves intentional action, relations with others, and the aim to promote flourishing. And because love is inherently uncontrolling, neither divine nor creaturely love controls.

Love can’t be omnipotent.

While the definition of love applies to God and creatures, divine love is greater in degree than creaturely love. Divine love is universal and therefore differs in scope, because only God is omnipresent. God’s love differs in duration and frequency, because God loves everlastingly. Divine love differs in adequacy, because God is omniscient and therefore better knows what promotes well-being. Divine love is necessary, because it’s God’s nature to love; creatures may or may not love. Divine love is perfectly sensitive and vulnerable, because God is affected by all creation. Creatures often fail to empathize with a few, let alone be sensitive to all.

The “potence” of amipotence pertains to God’s influence. Divine power is immensely more influential than creaturely power. God is more powerful, in part, because God affects all creation. And divine love is more powerful because everlastingly relentless. The power of amipotence is active and receptive, empowering and empathetic, wooing but persistent, and always uncontrolling. God’s love is literally the most powerful force in the universe.

An amipotent God is not omnipotent in the sense of having all power. It is impossible for a loving God to have all power, because love requires responsive others with power. An amipotent God is not omnipotent in the sense of being able to do absolutely anything. After all, love cannot sin, cannot force its own way, cannot be isolated, cannot make 2 + 2 = 7, and more. And an amipotent God does not control creatures or circumstances, because love is inherently uncontrolling. 

God exerts the greatest conceivable power but, thank goodness, is not omnipotent. Amipotence is maximal divine power in the service of love.

I still would take it a step forward: love IS power, and not separate from it. This is where my thought gets kind of Thomist (he believed love and justice and wisdom were all one but we experienced them differently). All virtues are extensions of love. All divine attributes or energies are emanations of Love. I haven’t fully fleshed out or developed this idea but. I’m glad to know there are others who have had similar thoughts.

I think this is also a way to have still have a philosophical understanding of God (that is, God as Ultimate Reality), while still keeping an open theist and immanent perspective. But I need to meditate on this first

More Posts from Angel-sans-halo and Others

1 month ago
Father Joseph, Pray For Us

Father Joseph, pray for us

1 month ago

ah, the rosary, the stim toy full of jesus

1 month ago

Daily mortification ideas, please add up

- When you get up to get a cup of water, always ask if anyone else in the room wants water too

- When you finish eating, look for people in the table who have also finished and discretly go wash their dishes / put their dish away / trow away their wrappers etc

- Routinely ask people who are happy to be useful to help you in small, effortless tasks. Specially small kids or older folk, even if it would be quicker to do it all by yourself

- When there's plenty of things to carry, pick the heaviest you can carry before other people notice

- When dividing tasks, pick the one the others like the least

- Take notes in class in a way people next to you can steal a glance (I started doing this when I sat near some kid with dyslexia, but it can help anyone if your handwriting is better than the teacher's, or if you're more organized)

- When eating something good, give the last piece to someone who also likes it in a way that's hard to refuse, eg "here, saved it for you" (it's important that it be the last piece, because that's the hardest to let go)

- Purposefully eat bits of food you dislike

- Say good things about other people behind their backs

- Don't refuse compliments, we all know that it'll only make people compliment you more. Smile, say thank you, and carry on to another topic

1 month ago

Shout out to men and masc’s who veil. Truly our strongest soldiers.

1 month ago

One million dollar question: is it true that the Bible condems homosexuality? I had a discussion with two conservatives who sent me some verses that seem to confirm that but i don't know much about the context although i know this is important too

Let’s start here: why is this the million dollar question? Why does it matter what the Bible has to say about sex, or love, or human relationships? At the end of the day, it’s just a book, right?

Oceans of ink (and blood) have been spilled over not only what the Bible says, but what it does, how it functions. The course of empires, nations, and families have been shaped by the contents of this book, and from a historical and cultural perspective, it holds a lot of weight. But you didn’t ask about the sociological, you asked about the theological, so let’s explore. 

Different Christian traditions vary in their approach to scripture. For example: some Protestant denominations believe that the Bible is inspired, inerrant, and infallible. In this paradigm, God is the ultimate author of scripture working through human hands, and the resulting text is both without error and in no way deceptive or mistaken. Similarly, The Second Vatican Council decreed that “the books of Scripture must be acknowledged as teaching solidly, faithfully and without error that truth which God wanted put into sacred writings for the sake of salvation.” When a member of the clergy is ordained into the Episcopal Church they swear that they “do believe the Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments to be the Word of God, and to contain all things necessary to salvation.”

Can you see how many of these points of doctrine overlap yet seek to distinguish themselves from one another? Theologians have spent lifetimes arguing over definitions, and even when they manage to settle on solid teachings, the way that the teaching is interpreted by the clergy and incorporated into the lives of the laity varies WIDELY. As much as systematic theology may try, humans aren’t systematic beings. We’re highly contextual: we only exist in relation to others, to history, to circumstance, and to the divine. We simply cannot call up God to confirm church teaching, and I think a lot of people cling excessively to the Bible as a result of the ache (dare I even say trauma) of being separated from God via space and time in the way we currently are.

God is here, but God is not here. God is within us, God is within the beloved, God is within the sea and sky and land, and yet we cannot grasp God to our bodies in the way we long to. In this earthly lifetime, we are forever enmeshed in God, yet forever distinct, and that is our great joy and our great tragedy.

So barring a direct spiritual experience or the actual second coming, we're left to sort through these things ourselves. And because humans are flawed, our interpretations will always be flawed. Even with the presence of the Holy Spirit in our lives guiding us.

When engaging with any sort of Biblical debate, it is essential that you have a strong understanding of what the Bible means to you, an an embodied individual living a brief little awful and wonderful life on Earth. Otherwise it's easy to get pushed around by other people’s convincing-sounding arguments and sound bites.

Here’s where I show my hand. As a confirmed Episcopalian I believe that reason, tradition, and scripture form the “three-legged stool” upon which the church stands, interdependent and interrelational to each other, but I’ve also like, lived a life outside of books. I’ve met God in grimy alleyways and frigid ocean waters and in bed with my lovers. So my stool is actually four-legged, because I think it’s essential to incorporate one’s personal experience of God into the mix as well. (I did not invent this: it’s called the Wesleyan quadrilateral, but the official Wesleyan quadrilateral insists that scripture must trump all other legs of the table in the case of a conflict which...*cynical noises*)

Please do not interpret this answer as me doing a hand-wavey "it's all vibes, man, we're all equally right and equally wrong", but I do absolutely think we have a responsibility as creatures to weigh the suffering and/or flourishing of our fellow creatures against teachings handed down through oral tradition, schisms, imperial takeover of faith, and translation and mistranslation. Do I believe the Bible is sacred, supernatural even, and that it contains all things necessary to find one's way to God, if that is the way God chooses to manifest to an individual in a given lifetime? Absolutely. Do I believe it is a priceless work of art and human achievement that captures ancient truths and the hopes of a people (as well as a record of their atrocities) through symbols, stories, and signs? Unto my death, I do.

However, I am wary of making an object of human creation, God-breathed though it may be, into an idol, and trapping God in its pages like God is some sort of exotic bug we can pin down with a sewing needle.

Finally, we have reached the homosexuality debate. One of my favorite sayings of Jesus is Matthew 5: 15-17: "Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep's clothing but inwardly are ravenous wolves. You will know them by their fruits. Are grapes gathered from thorns, or figs from thistles? In the same way, every good tree bears good fruit, but the bad tree bears bad fruit." In other words: look at what religious teachings have wrought in the world. When I look at homophobic interpretations of the Bible, I see destruction, abuse, suffering, neglect, alienation, spiritual decay, and death. When I look at theology that affirms the holiness of LGBTQ+ relationships, I see joy, laughter, community building, thoughtful care, blooming families, creativity, resilience, and compassion. I see the love of Christ at work in the world. I see the hands of a God who chose under no duress to take up residence in a human body, to drink wine with tax collectors and break bread with sex workers and carry urchin children around on his shoulders. That's my limited little pet interpretation, but hey, that's all any of us really have, at the end of the day.

So, I am absolutely happy to do a play-by-play breakdown of why those passages you were given (we queer Christians often call them "clobber passages" or "texts of terror") don't hold water in a theological, historical, and cultural context. We can talk about Jesus blessing the eunuch and the institution of Greek pederasty and Levitical purity laws and Paul because I've done that reading. I've spent my nights crying in self-hatred and leafing through doctrine books and arguing with my pastors and writing long grad school essays on the subjects. Send me the verses, if you can remember them, and I'll take a look. But it's worth noting that out of the entire Bible, I believe there are only six that explicitly condemn homosexuality AND I'm being generous and including Sodom and Gommorah here, which is a willful and ignorant misreading if I've ever seen one.

In the meantime, I recommend books by people smarter than me! Try Outside The Lines: How Embracing Queerness Will Transform Your Faith by Mihee Kim-Kort, or Does Jesus Really Love Me by Jeff Chu, or Transforming: The Bible and the Lives of Transgender Christians by Austen Hartke!

And take a breath, dear one. Breathe in God, in the droplets of water in the air and in the wind from the south. Breathe in the gift of life, and know that you are loved, now and unto the end of the age and even beyond then.

1 month ago

ah, the rosary, the stim toy full of jesus

1 month ago

Get weirder about God

1 month ago

Jesus is coming, but while we wait for him you know what you can do?

Punch a nazi.

  • angel-sans-halo
    angel-sans-halo reblogged this · 1 month ago
  • singinintheraine
    singinintheraine liked this · 1 month ago
  • finalmoss
    finalmoss liked this · 1 month ago
  • truly-fantastic-me
    truly-fantastic-me liked this · 2 months ago
  • issavibesis
    issavibesis liked this · 2 months ago
  • tawnytyto
    tawnytyto liked this · 3 months ago
  • lightblueminecraftorchid
    lightblueminecraftorchid liked this · 3 months ago
  • quiche-quibbles
    quiche-quibbles reblogged this · 3 months ago
  • laceofcoins
    laceofcoins liked this · 3 months ago
  • skalter
    skalter liked this · 3 months ago
  • king-of-tragedy
    king-of-tragedy liked this · 4 months ago
  • prometheuslovechild
    prometheuslovechild liked this · 4 months ago
  • sweeter-also-than-honey
    sweeter-also-than-honey liked this · 4 months ago
  • snowfall-in-may
    snowfall-in-may liked this · 4 months ago
  • ailelie
    ailelie liked this · 4 months ago
  • void-ptr
    void-ptr liked this · 4 months ago
  • chubby-elf-hux
    chubby-elf-hux liked this · 4 months ago
  • fierysword
    fierysword reblogged this · 4 months ago
  • mizu-cipher
    mizu-cipher liked this · 4 months ago
  • quiche-quibbles
    quiche-quibbles liked this · 4 months ago
  • kit-and-kitsune
    kit-and-kitsune reblogged this · 4 months ago
  • kit-and-kitsune
    kit-and-kitsune liked this · 4 months ago
  • catwingsthespatula
    catwingsthespatula liked this · 4 months ago
  • idylls-of-the-divine-romance
    idylls-of-the-divine-romance reblogged this · 4 months ago
  • theancientfootsteps
    theancientfootsteps liked this · 4 months ago
  • nothingrotten
    nothingrotten liked this · 4 months ago
  • 2000three
    2000three reblogged this · 4 months ago
  • 2000three
    2000three liked this · 4 months ago
  • amipotence
    amipotence reblogged this · 4 months ago
  • thisisahouse-notahorrorshow
    thisisahouse-notahorrorshow liked this · 4 months ago
  • colorful-cryptid
    colorful-cryptid reblogged this · 4 months ago
  • colorful-cryptid
    colorful-cryptid liked this · 4 months ago
  • johntheforrunner
    johntheforrunner liked this · 4 months ago
  • reazonozaer
    reazonozaer liked this · 4 months ago
  • idylls-of-the-divine-romance
    idylls-of-the-divine-romance reblogged this · 4 months ago
angel-sans-halo - 𝕯𝖚𝖒 𝖘𝖕𝖎𝖗𝖔, 𝖘𝖕𝖊𝖗𝖔
𝕯𝖚𝖒 𝖘𝖕𝖎𝖗𝖔, 𝖘𝖕𝖊𝖗𝖔

reconstructing my spirituality one repost at a time

36 posts

Explore Tumblr Blog
Search Through Tumblr Tags